Step 1 of 2 · Your details

Book a free consultation

Tell us a little about yourself, then choose a time to talk with our team.

Choose a time in the next step. No obligation.

We’ll use your details to respond and prefill your Calendly booking. Privacy policy · Calendly privacy

Mural logo

Product-led growth · paid media & activation

Paid search built for users who come back.

B2B SaaS

For a freemium collaboration platform, the value of a sign-up depends on what happens next. DBM aligned Mural’s Google Ads, Microsoft Ads, and Meta work around product activation, brand demand, and the path from a first visit to an engaged user.

Talk to an ExpertTalk through this account on a free call

Reporting period: 2026 case-study reporting · comparison windows vary by measure

+2 ppReported click-to-sign-up conversion-rate gain

2026 case-study reporting · year-over-year comparison

50%+Of day-7 returning users from brand search

With less than one quarter of search spend

~⅓Lower cost per sign-up on an efficient search theme

European visual-tool searches versus the account average

1.4×Average sign-up rate on comparison searches

Competitor-comparison searches versus the account average

Source: DBM’s Mural paid-media case-study reporting. The conversion-rate gain is two percentage points, not a 2% relative increase. Brand results describe a share of returning users and spend, not incremental lift. Search-theme cost and sign-up-rate comparisons use the account average. These are paid-media results, not SEO outcomes, and should not be combined into a single growth rate. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Behind the headline

Why the lowest sign-up cost did not always mean the best users

Why the lowest sign-up cost did not always mean the best users. 2026 case-study reporting · comparison windows vary by measure
Search segmentCost-per-sign-up rankCost-per-day-1-return rank
Brand searches41
Mind maps · US & Canada52
Competitor comparisons33
Whiteboard · US & Canada84
Templates & use cases25
Automated campaigns76
Mind maps · Europe17
Flowcharts & diagrams98
Whiteboard · Europe69
Product-team searches1010

One reported month in 2026. Rank 1 means the lowest cost among these ten segments. Rankings compare cost efficiency, not actual costs or growth over time.

Challenge

Where the account stood

A low-cost registration can look successful in an ad platform while producing few engaged users. Mural needed to distinguish sign-up volume from return visits and adoption, protect valuable brand searches from competitors, and investigate landing-page mismatches that interrupted activation.

Approach

What DBM did

DBM compared cost per sign-up with cost per returning user, then reviewed search themes, brand coverage, ad copy, and landing-page routing against that fuller picture. Product activation signals and Salesforce stages gave acquisition reviews context beyond the initial registration.

1

Separated sign-ups by company SSO, day-1 and day-7 return, and free versus paid plan. Reviewed Salesforce qualification and meeting stages alongside product events, with activation signals feeding back into advertising measurement.

2

Reviewed brand competition, bidding flexibility, ad assets, and comparison-page sitelinks so visitors evaluating alternatives could find Mural’s product information.

3

Analyzed nearly 1,000 headlines within keyword themes. Verb-led headlines were associated with roughly 30% lower cost per conversion, with that pattern appearing in eight of nine themes. Those observations informed copy decisions rather than being presented as a controlled lift test.

4

Traced weak next-day return performance in a process-diagram ad group to a sales-page destination. Corrected the routing to the relevant product page instead of assuming the ad itself needed a rebuild.

5

Maintained search coverage and exclusions through weekly reviews. The reported 12-week activity included 2,511 negative keywords added, 1,642 keywords added, 283 keywords paused, 138 ad-copy changes, and 57 target CPA adjustments.

6

Investigated sharp account-wide activation changes as possible measurement issues before making broad budget cuts. Monitoring also flagged a stopped conversion upload so affected figures could be treated cautiously.

What the analysis showed

Ad-copy decisions grounded in the account’s own data

Assets were compared within keyword themes so the team could distinguish language associated with sign-ups from language that mainly generated clicks.

Ad-copy decisions grounded in the account’s own data
Observed copy patternReported finding
Verb-led headlinesAbout 30% lower cost per conversion; pattern present in 8 of 9 themes
Security and enterprise wording40% lower cost per conversion
‘Easy’ in descriptions28% lower click-through rate and 8% higher cost per conversion
Concrete product descriptions in calloutsMore than 10× lower cost per conversion than abstract business language

2026 asset-level analysis. These are observed associations within the account, not controlled experiments or universal copywriting benchmarks. In the search-segment table above, rank 1 means the lowest cost; ranks are not absolute costs or a before-and-after trend.

Account operations

The ongoing work behind the account

Reported activity across a 12-week period

2,511

Negative keywords added

1,642

Keywords added · 283 paused

138

Ad-copy changes

57

Target CPA adjustments

Monitoring & judgment

Check the measurement before changing the budget

A sudden account-wide drop in next-day returns—to roughly one quarter of recent levels—prompted an import and event-definition review. A broad, simultaneous change can be a measurement issue, so the team avoided treating the decline as proof that every campaign had weakened.

  1. STEP 01

    Check how day-1 returns are counted and whether conversion uploads are running.

  2. STEP 02

    Use sign-ups and cost per sign-up provisionally while activation data is investigated.

  3. STEP 03

    Recheck the affected period before making decisions from the return-user figures.

Services involved

What made this work

More customer results

Related case studies

Selected campaign growth · B2B SaaSB2B SaaS

B2B SaaS platform

More qualified conversions on less spend: one B2B SaaS Google Ads campaign grew attributed qualified offline conversions by 322% while lowering cost per qualified conversion by 86.2%. The comparison covers consecutive 30-day periods in 2025.

Read the case study
Revenue efficiencyB2B SaaS

B2B SaaS, Series B

A Series B B2B SaaS company replaced its previous agency after structural issues went unflagged for months—and cut cost per acquisition by 43% within 60 days.

Read the case study

Your next growth opportunity

Your account could be next.

A senior strategist reviews your account, tracking, and lead quality—and hands you a prioritized readout in plain English.

Talk to an Expert